🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."