🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.